The “Banking Concept” and “The Literary Transaction”

Square

In her article, “The Literary Transaction: Evocation and Response,” Louise M. Rosenblatt writes about “reader-response theory,” which suggests a reader-centered approach to interpreting a text. Rather than the student passively absorbing information from a text, reader-response theory represents the student as having a more active role in the reading process. The student’s experiences and preconceptions she brings while she reads a text are equally as important to the eventual interpretation as the content of the text itself. This rejection of a unidirectional model of reading resembles Freire’s rejection of the authoritative teacher-student relationship. She writes, “Reading is a transaction, a two-way process…” (268). Likewise, Freire supports a more reciprocal relationship between students and teachers, in which the teacher “is himself taught in dialogue with the students, who in turn while being taught also teach” (4).

Comment

One Reply to “The “Banking Concept” and “The Literary Transaction””

  1. Hi Holly! I’ve never heard of Rosenblatt’s piece, but I think you summarized her piece and concept very well. It sounds like her approach is one more active and framed around the student, and you did a great job connecting the two pieces, and also backing your analysis with Rosebltatt’s piece.

Leave a Reply